Dr Richard Rowland - Institute for Religion & Critical Inquiry (Faculty of Theology and Philosophy)
Accreditation in-progress - Supervisor is eligible to co-supervise with another fully accredited supervisor (Principal Supervisor)
My published work deals with reasons, value, the relationship between reasons and value, the moral error theory, and epistemic normativity. I am currently completing a manuscript in which I give the first book-length defence of the buck-passing account of value, according to which goodness and value can be analysed in terms of normative reasons.
The focus of my current research is the meta-ethical consequences of moral disagreement. I argue that moral disagreement has important meta-ethical and ethical consequences, but these consequences are rather more nuanced than has been previously argued. I am also working on reasons fundamentalism and a formal account of wrongness.
Applied Ethics ; Ethics ; metaethics ; normativity ; Political philosophy ; moral psychology ; normative ethics ;
conceptual anlaysis ; experimental philosophy ;
- Moral Disagreements: Philosophical and Practical Implications (PhD) (Principal Supervisor)
Reasons or Fittingness First?, in Ethics
Our intuitions about the experience machine, in Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
The epistemology of moral disagreement, in Philosophy Compass
Reasons as the Unity Among the Varieties of Goodness, in Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
Rescuing Companions in Guilt Argumenta, in Philosophical Quarterly
In defence of good simpliciter, in Philosophical Studies
Dissolving the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem, in Philosophical Studies
Moral Error Theory and the Argument from Epistemic Reasons, in Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
Wrong kind of reasons and Consequences, in Utilitas